![]() ![]() The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. APA 6 th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. And/or there is some use of questionable sources.Ģ0 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. APA 6 th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. ![]() And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources.ġ5 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. ![]() Frequent errors in APA 6 th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper.ġ0 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given many statements seem unsubstantiated. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. Or the student failed to submit a final paper.ĥ out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6 th Edition format. Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). No aspects of the required answer are missing. The answer is complete.ĥ0 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. Elements of the required response may also be lacking.Ĥ0 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.Ģ0 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology and elements of the response are lacking.ģ0 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Priority Decision: Based on the assessment data presented, what are the priority nursing diagnoses? Are there any collaborative problems?Ĭ ontent (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points).Teamwork and Collaboration: What therapeutic modalities are most appropriate for N.T.Describe the common laboratory findings that are indicative of DIC.What additional subjective and objective clinical findings would indicate the presence of DIC?. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |